ABSTRACT
Introduction. The use of telemedicine services has increased worldwide during recent years because of national strategies for digitalization of health care and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, healthcare professionals often express uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions. The TELEMED database (https://telemedicine.cimt.dk/) was introduced by the Centre for Innovative Medical Technology (CIMT) at Odense University Hospital to ensure that hospital managers, healthcare professionals, and other stakeholders have access to scientific studies of telemedicine interventions. Methods. The database constitutes a structured literature search in PubMed for randomized and non-randomized controlled trials on the use of telemedicine for treating somatic diseases in the hospital setting. The search was conducted by staff members in the health technology assessment unit at CIMT. Identified studies were sorted by first screening titles and s and then by reading full-text versions. The data extracted from the studies included setting, intervention, patient group, type of telemedicine, clinical effect, patient perception, and implementation challenges. The value of each study was also assessed with respect to effectiveness. Results. A total of 510 articles were selected for data extraction and assessment. The database provides results from 22 different specialties and can be searched using the criteria of medical specialty, country, technology, clinical effect, patient experience, and economic effect. The database serves as an information platform for clinical departments who wish to implement telemedicine services. It has great potential for supporting digital transformation during COVID- 19 by providing accessible evidence-based information on patient groups and relevant technologies and their effects. More than 95 percent of the studies in the database that compared telemedicine with a control group showed either statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes with telemedicine or no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions. The TELEMED database provides an easily accessible overview of existing evidence-based telemedicine services. The database is freely available and is expected to be continuously improved and broadened over time.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to suggestions that cost-effectiveness analyses should adopt a broader perspective when estimating costs. This review aims to provide an overview of economic evaluations of interventions against viral pandemics in terms of the perspective taken, types of costs included, comparators, type of economic model, data sources and methods for estimating productivity costs. STUDY DESIGN: Scoping literature review. METHODS: Publications were eligible if they conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, cost-benefit analysis or cost-minimisation analysis and evaluated interventions aimed at viral pandemics or for patients infected with viral pandemic disease. We searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus for relevant references and charted data from the selected full-text publications into a predefined spreadsheet based on research sub-questions, summary tables and figures. RESULTS: From 5410 references, 36 full-text publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The economic evaluations were mainly model based and included direct medical costs of hospital treatment. Around half of the studies included productivity costs and the proportion of total costs attributed to productivity costs ranged from 10% to 90%, depending on estimation methods, assumptions about valuation of time, type of intervention, severity of illness and degree of transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Economic evaluations of interventions against viral pandemics differed in terms of estimation methods and reporting of productivity costs, even for similar interventions. Hence, the literature on economic evaluations for pandemic response would benefit from having standards for conducting and reporting economic evaluations, especially for productivity costs.